• Home
  • Start Here
  • Podcast
  • Thinking Bigly
  • Investing
  • Arts
    • Contact/Donate
    • Sign Up
    • Search
    • Privacy
    • Disclaimer
    • Arts
    • Investing
    • Newsletter
    • Theatre
    • Poetics
    • India (1997)
    • Indonesia (1998)
    • Popular
    • Blogs
    • Food
    • Photography
    • Personal
    • Mingle
    • Writer Bio
    • Investor Bio
    • Me
    • Yellow Gentlemen
    • Investment Aphorisms
    • Places in Between
    • Grants
    • Angel Investing
    • Shop
    • Unconference
Menu

Then Do Better

Street Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number

Your Custom Text Here

Then Do Better

  • Home
  • Start Here
  • Podcast
  • Thinking Bigly
  • Investing
  • Arts
  • Support
    • Contact/Donate
    • Sign Up
    • Search
    • Privacy
    • Disclaimer
  • Archive
    • Arts
    • Investing
    • Newsletter
    • Theatre
    • Poetics
    • India (1997)
    • Indonesia (1998)
  • Blogs
    • Popular
    • Blogs
    • Food
    • Photography
    • Personal
  • About
    • Mingle
    • Writer Bio
    • Investor Bio
    • Me
    • Yellow Gentlemen
    • Investment Aphorisms
    • Places in Between
    • Grants
    • Angel Investing
    • Shop
    • Unconference

Bitcoin. A mystery narrative of seductive freedom.

November 30, 2017 Ben Yeoh
newton-bubble.png

Bitcoin has a seductive story. All great investment manias have a compelling narrative behind them, all with a fistful of truth. An early one being tulip bulbs. I still argue Bitcoin is NOT an investment, but a speculation in a maybe-currency. It also is waste of energy (in my view). Bitcoin mining energy, which consumes the same as a medium sized country like Ireland, could be used more productively given the pollution cost emitted.

 

Still, the mania has further to run, in my view, as although many random people I meet talk about it, there are still many people to be seduced.

 

Jeffrey Robinson, the author of BitCon, writes that bitcoin is "a digital-something pretending to be a currency; that same digital-something pretending to be a commodity; a political movement that reeks of a delusional cult; and a technology — a unique peer-to-peer transfer system — that happens to be brilliant."

 

Block chain technology is great. Bitcoin itself, not so much.

 

But, back to the story…. My early career was as a stock broker - the sell-side - and as all good sell-siders know, selling investments is about selling a story, selling a narrative… indeed politics and much of life today is about the story… “facts” and data are only a small (or even non-existent) part of the debate.   Don’t let a fact get in the way of a good story (fakenews).

 

An early story of being seduce by investment manias involves Isaac Newton of gravity, physics and maths fame.  He supposedly said (though my guess this is made up):

 

“I can calculate the movement of stars, but not the madness of men.”

 

(Nassim Taleb would agree.  Stars and comets and that type of physics are systems we can calculate. Complex systems like markets are beyond us, mix in fat tails and by their nature, black swans, will always be beyond our imagination).

 

Newton was an early winner then victim of the South Sea China Bubble. See picture above.  He made a nice profit, but then went back in and lost it all.  Some traders (eg supposedly Soros) can identify bubbles early and exit before the crash, but it’s a rare skill / luck.

 

So… the bitcoin story… it starts with a legendary mysterious inventor (pen name Satoshi Makamoto), who is unknown, unidentified and has walked away from billions to serve a larger purpose….this purposes inspires those such as this FT reader:

 

...The internet as we know it would not exist without the government. Crypto makes governments obsolete. Cryptocurrency combines value and governance into one package that obviates the need for nation-states. And it doesn't have to just be used for money; it can be used to decentralize anything that we currently produce or exchange in a centralized way. That is what is exciting here. Not making a bunch of money, or the massive transfer of wealth from the old guard to a bunch of risk taking nerds. The latter is exciting to me because who doesn't like money, but it's much more deeply exciting because our current governments (all of them), while mostly better than what we had before, are a truly awful human system. They tax humanity to make war with each other….

 

It’s also used by criminals (or any who don’t want to be traced), those who might consider gold a store of value, those who only have access to very unstable currencies.

 

It appeals to a certain kind of libertarian thinker, it appeals to those who are disillusioned with government (and that’s a lot of people)... and there’s the nub:

 

It appeals to those who love a good story. And that’s all of us. Economists would do well to remember that.

 


If you'd like to feel inspired by commencement addresses and life lessons try: Ursula K Le Guin on literature as an operating manual for life;  Neil Gaiman on making wonderful, fabulous, brilliant mistakes; or Nassim Taleb's commencement address; or JK Rowling on the benefits of failure.  Or Charlie Munger on always inverting.

Cross fertilise.  On investing try a thought on stock valuations.  Or Ray Dalio on populism and risk.  You can also click on the Carbon tag below.  

A lesson from autism here.

In Investing, Economics Tags bitcoin

Bitcoin. Not an investment.

September 12, 2017 Ben Yeoh
FullSizeRender.jpg

Bitcoin is not an investment (as I define it).  It is a money or a currency. You can speculate in it and trade in it. But I do not think it has a major place for most people as an investment, just like most people would not have South African Rand as an investment.

It does reveal facets of modern money, which we often ignore.  Money relies on belief. Money relies on trust. Its value relies on a network of people who accept it as money. It helps that you can exchange if for goods, services and other currencies. It is not backed by gold, goods or tax.

Go back in time. Sea shells were used as money.

The traditional qualities of money:  durability, handiness or convenience, recognizability and divisibility were mostly embedded in shells.  (Large shells and small shells harder to divide but easier than camels). Cowry shells were still used as currency until the 20th century.

Fiduciary (or trust, fiat) currency was used in China over 2000 years ago, so in that respect bitcoin has a distinguished history to draw upon.

Howard Marks in his latest September memo (here are some thoughts on his July memo) partially adjusts his view on bitcoin, also concluding it is money, but sharing my view (or perhaps I should be sharing his view, Marks being much more distinguished than me!) that is it not a good investment. If you fancy a gamble, sure why not? But know it for what it is. A speculation. Perhaps like gold, it could have a place as geopolitical hedge, as money/gold has done over history, but I still don’t think that makes it an investment. It could make it a “safe asset” (see Andolffi below) but again I’m unsure that’s an investment.

Bitcoin could possibly be valued. There are some valiant attempts. The assumptions and data needed do seem to put it in the realm of speculation.  But, if interested look at some of these writers below:

David Andolfatto (who works for fed reserve bank of st louis)  is great on bitcoin - blog here . His view seems to be bitcoin is lousy money but a possible store of value.  This slide deck here gives a thorough overview of Bitcoin that I recommend.

Tony Yates (former Bank of England) talks about the barriers to cryptocurrencies taking over at an FT guest post.


If you'd like to feel inspired by life lessons try: Ursula K Le Guin on literature as an operating manual for life;  Neil Gaiman on making wonderful, fabulous, brilliant mistakes; or Nassim Taleb's commencement address; or JK Rowling on the benefits of failure.  Or Charlie Munger on always inverting. 


Eric Lonnergan on an overview of Bitcoin’s characteristics including “intelligence” in aspects of “self-regulation”  (I’m personally unsure if that’s ‘true’ intelligence cf. Shells, gold) . Lonnergan writes: “Bitcoin’s ‘intelligence’ involves the application of a very simple rule: the quantity expands to 21 million and then it ‘grows’ at zero percent. I’m less interested in the merits of this rule, which are well-rehearsed, than the possibilities it suggests. The ‘intelligence’ of money could be extended in many interesting ways. From an economic standpoint, the obvious improvement in intelligence would be to design a currency which expands and contracts in line with demand for currency. Embedding this in the currency’s DNA would render central bank decision-making redundant – to everyone’s advantage. ‘Intelligence’ could also embed social goals – for example the currency could self-regulate the activities for which it is used, perhaps even rewarding or punishing activities contingent on their social impact.”

Howard Marks is always worth reading if you have any interest in markets and the world.

Marks caution joins the chimes of Ray Dalio (post here), John Hussman (post here) along with Albert Edwards (currently at SocGen (with Andrew Lapthorne, his recent chart here), and to some extent James Montier (who also worked alongside Albert at DK previously, but has a behavioural economist streak to his work; now at GMO) and Jeremy Grantham (at GMO) have tended to put quite some weight on these type of metrics and valuation discipline, at least for long cycle returns (around 7 years). It's interesting that most of this group are chiming quite loudly, with the possible exception of Grantham who is ringing in a slightly different key (suggesting much slower reversions to the mean than before).

The world of macro has so many cross currents. 

There is another interesting chime with Nassim Taleb's thinking from his pop risk books. This idea that we do not handle "fat tails" or "Black Swan" events very well.  That models do not account for these events well (real world is not "normal" or "gaussian").  This dovetails well with Hyman Minsky's observation/theory on why we have and will always have boom/bust cycles.  

In Investing Tags investing, bitcoin
Join the mailing list for a monthly blog digest. Email not to be used for anything else.

Thank you! 

Follow me on LinkedIN
Contact/Support