• Home
  • Start Here
  • Podcast
  • Thinking Bigly
  • Investing
  • Arts
    • Contact/Donate
    • Sign Up
    • Search
    • Privacy
    • Disclaimer
    • Arts
    • Investing
    • Newsletter
    • Theatre
    • Poetics
    • India (1997)
    • Indonesia (1998)
    • Popular
    • Blogs
    • Food
    • Photography
    • Personal
    • Mingle
    • Writer Bio
    • Investor Bio
    • Me
    • Yellow Gentlemen
    • Investment Aphorisms
    • Places in Between
    • Grants
    • Angel Investing
    • Shop
    • Unconference
Menu

Then Do Better

Street Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number

Your Custom Text Here

Then Do Better

  • Home
  • Start Here
  • Podcast
  • Thinking Bigly
  • Investing
  • Arts
  • Support
    • Contact/Donate
    • Sign Up
    • Search
    • Privacy
    • Disclaimer
  • Archive
    • Arts
    • Investing
    • Newsletter
    • Theatre
    • Poetics
    • India (1997)
    • Indonesia (1998)
  • Blogs
    • Popular
    • Blogs
    • Food
    • Photography
    • Personal
  • About
    • Mingle
    • Writer Bio
    • Investor Bio
    • Me
    • Yellow Gentlemen
    • Investment Aphorisms
    • Places in Between
    • Grants
    • Angel Investing
    • Shop
    • Unconference

Upcycle Studios, Orestad; sustainable housing development, Lendager, NREP

October 12, 2019 Ben Yeoh
public.jpeg

Upcycle Housing Development

-Working example of how waste can be used in construction

-Lower carbon impact on contruction and running costs

-Comparable construction costs

Re-think. Reduce. Reuse. Recycle. Most of all re-think. Carlsberg Chair Flemming Besenbacher speaking at C40, Copenhagen. I visited a sustainable housing development made with upcycled materials at a 70% lower impact and 50% better energy running costs. 


While there are challenges in scaling and waste supply chain infrastructure, the developer + architects (NREP, Lendager) argued there were no insurmountable barriers to scaling this to cities world wide. 


The design and liveability is wonderful. The capital costs while c. 5% higher should come down in future projects.


IMG_9683.jpeg
IMG_9684.jpeg
IMG_9685.jpeg
IMG_9686.jpeg
IMG_9687.jpeg
IMG_9688.jpeg
IMG_9689.jpeg
IMG_9690.jpeg
IMG_9691.jpeg

The ethos behind this was similar to what my friend, Hana Loftus (of HAT Projects)  relayed to me about the Rural Studio project in Alabama, US and her time there.


The Rural Studio are fairly individual projects, made on very limited budgets. They won’t scale like Lendager’s hope to. But the principles and ethos those builder-architects go on to make, do last. 


They are examples of happening now, and happening for a while. 


Links

Hat Projects: https://www.hatprojects.com/projects/

Rural Studios: http://ruralstudio.org/

Article on part of the project: https://arcspace.com/feature/upcycle-studios/

And https://www.dezeen.com/2019/04/16/upcycle-studios-townhouses-lendager-group-copenhagen-recycled-materials/

And link to Lendager https://lendager.com/

And NREP https://nrep.com/

In Investing, ESG, Carbon Tags Sustainability, investing, Design, Housing
← Hans Rosling on Al Gore and fearDealing with email →
Join the mailing list for a monthly blog digest. Email not to be used for anything else.

Thank you! 

Follow me on LinkedIN
Contact/Support